Australian home
HIA has also released a ‘Stamp Duty Watch’ report. Image – Canva
  • HIA has provided a submission to NSW's Consultation Paper
  • Supports proposals but says focus should be on actual benefits of reform
  • Reform has broad support, including REIWA and REINSW

The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has provided a submission to the Consultation Paper- Buying in NSW, Building a Future and has additionally released its own Stamp Duty Watch report – which is designed to regularly review policies across the country.

In terms of stamp duty, the NSW Paper has proposed an opt-in/opt-out system whereby buyers can either pay a lump sum upon acquiring a property liable for stamp duty or pay an annual tax – similar to a council rate.

Despite being labelled as an inefficient and inequitable tax that does not provide a stable revenue stream, many state governments have become dependent upon stamp duty.

Tim Reardon, HIA’s Chief Economist, says that any reform surrounding the replacement of stamp duty needs to take into consideration the actual benefits of such reform – not just the complexity of the transition.

“A constant state of paralysis has resulted in a cascading of tax problems as state governments have become increasingly dependent on stamp duty for revenue.

“This is despite stamp duty being universally recognised as one of the most inefficient and inequitable taxes that does not provide a stable revenue stream.”

Tim Reardon, HIA Chief Economist

Stamp duty reform currently enjoys strong support.

Tim McKibbin, CEO of REINSW, listed it as one of his five opportunities for property reform in the state. REIWA has supported this, as has the Real Estate Institute of Australia.

Mr Reardon added that as with all sound reforms, benefits of stamp duty reform need to ensure households that might be disadvantaged are compensated appropriately.

Mr Reardon does acknowledge that the case for stamp duty reform is so strong that no matter what option is adopted, many will support it.

“Penalising households for pursuing home ownership does not lead to good economic or social outcomes.

“A workforce able to relocate in the pursuit of education and employment opportunities, without incurring punitive taxes, supports a range of family and community goals.

“Households able to move to a home that suits the size of the family and the location of their employment and studies can lead to a more efficient allocation of public investment in transport infrastructure.”

Tim Reardon, HIA Chief Economist

You May Also Like

Property and design firms to shine a light on First Nations at Melbourne Fashion Festival

the Urban Oasis Runway presented by Architectus, ADP Consulting, MPA and Slattery will be held on Friday 9 March at 7.00pm.

Property Council launches CBD VIP campaign to raise footfall in Perth city

The move comes on the day most COVID restrictions across WA were lifted

2022 Apartment Awards to include seven new categories

Entries for the awards close 31 March

Harcourts Packham joins Toward Home to battle homelessness

‘Terra Firma’ provides short-term accommodation for vulnerable people

Top Articles

PropertyGuru Asia Property Awards (Australia) returns for its 7th edition, including several brand new award ...

This year's awards include several brand new categories, with entries closing 2 August 2024.

Housing crisis survival guide: How to buy your first Australian property

Three property experts give the low down on how to nab a home in this tough housing market.

Strata properties as investments: All you need to know about investing in a Perth unit

As the cost of renting approaches the cost of a mortgage, more people are investing in units to escape the rental trap.